英國反移民專題報導

2025年9月中旬，英國有11萬人走上街頭，要求政府加強管制移民。原本和平的集會活動，逐漸演變成暴力衝突，造成多名員警受傷。究竟是什麼原因，導致如此之多的民眾上街頭反移民呢？一起透過英文來了解國際時事吧！

樂學舍行銷小編

2025/9/30

9月13日，接近15萬人在英國倫敦參加名為「團結王國」（Unite the Kingdom）的反移民遊行。這是英國規模最大的極右翼集會。

（資料來源：Youtube - ABC News, UK lawmakers react to anti-immigration rally in London）

倫敦反移民抗議：起因與過程

極右派團體發起反移民遊行

英國9月13日有11萬人走上街頭，參加極右派團體「團結王國」（Unite the Kingdom）遊行活動，訴求包括要求加強管制移民、爭取言論自由，但現場出現不少反穆斯林與民族主義旗幟及口號，成為英國近代規模最大的極右示威活動之一。

On September 13, 110,000 people took to the streets in the UK to participate in a march organized by the far-right group "Unite the Kingdom." Their demands included stricter immigration controls and freedom of speech. However, there were many anti-Muslim and nationalist flags and slogans at the scene, making it one of the largest far-right demonstrations in modern British history.  

另一方面，現場有「挺身對抗種族主義」（Stand Up to Racism）反制抗議，人數約5000人，雙方被警方隔開。

On the other hand, there was a counter-protest called "Stand Up to Racism" with about 5,000 people. The police kept both sides separated.

而特斯拉創辦人馬斯克（Elon Musk）也透過視訊參與這場反移民抗議活動，透過大型螢幕直播對群眾表示：「暴力即將降臨到你們身上，你不是反擊就是等死。」表示英國需要一場「革命性的政府變革」。

Tesla founder Elon Musk also participated in this anti-immigration protest through video call. He spoke to the crowd through a large screen broadcast, saying: "Violence is coming to you. You either fight back or wait to die." He said that the UK needs "revolutionary government change."

行動深層背景：移民危機持續惡化

英國的移民問題並非近期才出現。自脫歐以來，英國政府一直努力控制移民數量，但效果有限。

The UK's immigration problem has not developed recently. Since Brexit, the British government has been trying to control immigration numbers, but with limited success.

根據官方數據，截至2025年6月，已有49,341名移民從法國乘坐小船「非法入境」英國，這個數字創下歷史新高。在斯塔默首相執政的第一年，尋求庇護者人數就達到創紀錄的111,084人，幾乎是2021年的兩倍。僅2025年通過小船非法入境者就已超過27,000人，比去年同期高出約50%。

According to official data, by June 2025, 49,341 immigrants had "illegally entered" the UK from France by small boats, a record high number. In Prime Minister Starmer's first year in office, the number of asylum seekers reached a record 111,084 people, almost double the 2021 figure. In 2025 alone, more than 27,000 people entered illegally by small boats, about 50% higher than the same period last year.

更令人擔憂的是經濟負擔。根據BBC報導，英國政府在庇護酒店上的每日花銷約為577萬英鎊，這筆成本預計將在2029年達到153億英鎊。法國政府聲稱，非法移民在英國尋求「無證工作」相對容易，且可以「無需納稅」，這使得英國比其他歐陸國家對尋求庇護者更具吸引力。

More worrying is the economic burden. According to BBC reports, the British government spends about £5.77 million daily on asylum hotels. This cost is expected to reach £15.3 billion by 2029. The French government claims that illegal immigrants find it relatively easy to seek "undocumented work" in the UK and can avoid paying taxes, making the UK more attractive to asylum seekers than other European countries.

導火線事件：埃平性侵案引爆民怨反移民

2025年7月上旬，一起駭人聽聞的性侵案徹底點燃了英國民眾的憤怒。一名來自衣索比亞的尋求庇護者被指控涉嫌三項性侵犯、性騷擾與教唆未成年女孩從事性行為等重罪。這名庇護者當時居住在埃平地區的貝爾酒店，該酒店是專門用來安置等待庇護申請審核的難民臨時住所。

In early July 2025, a shocking sexual assault case completely ignited British public anger. An asylum seeker from Ethiopia was charged with three counts of sexual assault, sexual harassment, and encouraging underage girls to engage in sexual activities. This asylum seeker was living at the Bell Hotel in the Epping area, which is used as temporary housing for refugees waiting for asylum application reviews.

案件曝光後，當地居民的憤怒情緒迅速高漲。許多家長擔心自己的孩子安全受到威脅，開始質疑政府將大量未經嚴格背景調查的庇護者安置在社區附近的政策。

After the case was revealed, local residents' anger quickly grew. Many parents worried about their children's safety and began questioning the government's policy of placing large numbers of asylum seekers who had not undergone strict background checks near communities.

反移民抗議活動升級：從和平示威到暴力衝突

從7月17日開始，憤怒的當地居民開始包圍貝爾酒店進行抗議。起初，抗議活動相對和平，但隨著參與人數增加和情緒激化，場面逐漸失控。抗議者高喊「拯救我們的孩子」、「送他們回家」、「保護我們的社區」等口號，要求立即將所有庇護者遷離該酒店。

Starting from July 17, angry local residents began surrounding the Bell Hotel in protest. Initially, the protests were relatively peaceful, but as the number of participants increased and emotions intensified, the situation gradually got out of control. Protesters shouted slogans like "Save our children," "Send them home," and "Protect our community," demanding the immediate removal of all asylum seekers from the hotel.

隨著抗議活動持續，衝突開始升級。憤怒的示威者開始以瓶子、石塊等物品攻擊到場維持秩序的警察，警方被迫使用防暴裝備和催淚瓦斯來控制場面。多名警察在衝突中受傷，數十名抗議者被逮捕。

As the protests continued, conflicts began to escalate. Angry demonstrators started attacking police officers maintaining order with bottles, stones, and other objects. Police were forced to use riot equipment and tear gas to control the situation. Several police officers were injured in the conflicts, and dozens of protesters were arrested.

移民相關法律行動：法律勝利激勵全國效仿

抗議活動持續一個月後，埃平森林地區議會決定採取法律行動。8月中旬，議會成功向倫敦高等法院申請臨時禁令，要求貝爾酒店老闆在9月12日前將店內入住的所有尋求庇護者遣離。法院批准了這項申請，理由是庇護者的存在對當地社區安全構成威脅。

After a month of protests, Epping Forest District Council decided to take legal action. In mid-August, the council successfully applied to London's High Court for a temporary injunction requiring the Bell Hotel owner to remove all asylum seekers from the premises by September 12. The court approved this application, reasoning that the presence of asylum seekers posed a threat to local community safety.

這項法律勝利如同投入平靜湖面的石子，激起層層漣漪。全國各地的反移民團體和當地居民看到了希望，認為可以通過法律途徑解決庇護者問題。牛津、伯恩茅斯、里茲、布萊頓、曼徹斯特等城市的居民紛紛效仿，開始在自己的社區組織類似抗議活動，試圖推動地方政府申請類似的法律禁令。

This legal victory was like throwing a stone into a calm lake, creating ripples across the nation. Anti-immigration groups and local residents across the country saw hope, believing they could solve the asylum seeker problem through legal means. Residents in Oxford, Bournemouth, Leeds, Brighton, Manchester, and other cities began copying this approach, organizing similar protest activities in their own communities and trying to push local governments to apply for similar legal injunctions.

湯米·羅賓遜崛起：極右翼領袖的政治操作移民議題

在這波反移民浪潮中，極右翼活動家湯米·羅賓遜（本名斯蒂芬·亞克斯利·列儂）敏銳地察覺到政治機會。作為反移民組織英國防衛聯盟的前領導人，羅賓遜有著豐富的街頭政治經驗。他曾因誹謗一名敘利亞難民而入獄，但這段經歷反而讓他在極右翼圈子中聲望更高。

In this wave of anti-immigration sentiment, far-right activist Tommy Robinson (real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon) keenly sensed a political opportunity. As the former leader of the anti-immigration organization English Defense League, Robinson had rich experience in street politics. He had been imprisoned for defaming a Syrian refugee, but this experience actually increased his reputation in far-right circles.

羅賓遜開始在社交媒體上大力宣傳，將埃平事件描述為「英國社會崩潰的象徵」和「政府背叛人民的證據」。他巧妙地將個別犯罪案件與整個移民政策聯繫起來，聲稱這只是「冰山一角」，更多的危險正在潛伏。

Robinson began heavily promoting on social media, describing the Epping incident as "a symbol of British society's collapse" and "evidence of the government's betrayal of the people." He cleverly connected individual criminal cases with overall immigration policy, claiming this was just "the tip of the iceberg" and that more dangers were lurking.

9月13日：史上最大規模極右翼反移民集會

「團結王國」的反移民大型集會

（資料來源：AP News）

經過數週的網路動員和組織準備，羅賓遜宣布將在9月13日舉行名為「團結王國」（Unite the Kingdom）的大型集會。他將此次活動包裝為「言論自由節」，聲稱要為「被政府壓制的真相」發聲。

After weeks of online mobilization and organizational preparation, Robinson announced he would hold a large rally called "Unite the Kingdom" on September 13. He packaged this event as a "Freedom of Speech Festival," claiming to speak out for "truths suppressed by the government."

集會當天，倫敦街頭出現了英國歷史上規模最大的極右翼示威。據BBC報導，接近15萬人從全國各地趕來參加遊行。示威者的構成相當複雜，既有憤怒的當地居民，也有職業的極右翼活動分子，還有大批年輕的「足球流氓」和民族主義者。

On the day of the rally, London's streets witnessed the largest far-right demonstration in British history. According to BBC reports, nearly 150,000 people came from across the country to participate in the march. The composition of demonstrators was quite complex, including angry local residents, professional far-right activists, large numbers of young "football hooligans," and nationalists.

遊行隊伍中旗幟飛舞，除了英國國旗和聖佐治十字旗外，還出現了美國國旗、以色列國旗，甚至有人頭戴「讓美國再次偉大」（MAGA）帽子。示威者高舉各種標語，包括「驅逐所有非法移民」、「停止船隻」、「英國優先」、「保護我們的孩子」、「斯塔默下台」等。

The march featured many flags, including British flags and St. George's Cross flags, as well as American flags, Israeli flags, and some people wearing "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) hats. Demonstrators held various signs including "Deport all illegal immigrants," "Stop the boats," "Britain First," "Protect our children," and "Starmer out."

羅賓遜在演講中情緒激昂地宣告：「今天是大不列顛文化革命的火花，這是我們的時刻！我們不會再沉默，不會再被政治正確綁架！」他還頻繁向已故的美國極端保守派活動家查理·柯克致敬，現場甚至為柯克舉行了默哀儀式。

In his emotional speech, Robinson declared: "Today is the spark of Great Britain's cultural revolution. This is our moment! We will no longer be silent, no longer be held hostage by political correctness!" He also frequently paid tribute to the late American extreme conservative activist Charlie Kirk, and the event even held a moment of silence for Kirk.

國際極右翼網路的介入移民議題

這次集會最引人注目的特點之一是國際極右翼人士的廣泛參與。特斯拉執行長伊隆·馬斯克透過大型螢幕進行視訊演講，他攻擊英國左翼政黨是「謀殺黨」，呼籲英國人「解散議會」並「重新投票」。馬斯克的言論極具煽動性，他警告現場群眾：「暴力即將降臨到你們身上，你們要麼反擊，要麼等死。英國需要一場革命性的政府變革。」

One of the most notable features of this rally was the widespread participation of international far-right figures. Tesla CEO Elon Musk gave a video speech through a large screen, attacking British left-wing parties as "murder parties" and calling on British people to "dissolve parliament" and "vote again." Musk's comments were highly inflammatory, warning the crowd: "Violence is coming to you. You either fight back or wait to die. Britain needs revolutionary government change."

法國極右翼政治家埃里克·澤穆爾和德國選擇黨的歐洲議員彼得·比斯特倫也透過視訊發表演講，將英國的移民問題描述為「歐洲文明面臨的共同威脅」。這種國際合作展現了當代極右翼運動跨國界的特徵。

French far-right politician Eric Zemmour and German AfD European Parliament member Petr Bystron also gave speeches via video, describing Britain's immigration problem as a "common threat to European civilization." This international cooperation demonstrated the transnational nature of contemporary far-right movements.

暴力衝突與警方應對

儘管組織者聲稱這是「和平集會」，但現場很快就出現了暴力衝突。一些激進的示威者開始攻擊警察，投擲石塊、瓶子和其他物品。警方不得不動用防暴裝備、水砲和催淚瓦斯來控制場面。

Although organizers claimed this was a "peaceful rally," violent conflicts quickly broke out. Some radical demonstrators began attacking police, throwing stones, bottles, and other objects. Police had to use riot equipment, water cannons, and tear gas to control the situation.

衝突中，約26名警員受傷，其中數人傷勢嚴重需要住院治療。警方最終逮捕了24名抗議者，罪名包括襲警、暴力行為和煽動暴力等。一些示威者還砸毀了中左翼政黨民主66（D66）總部的窗戶，造成嚴重財產損失。

In the conflicts, about 26 police officers were injured, with several seriously hurt and requiring hospitalization. Police eventually arrested 24 protesters on charges including assaulting police officers, violent behavior, and inciting violence. Some demonstrators also smashed windows at the center-left Democratic 66 (D66) party headquarters, causing serious property damage.

對反移民集會的反制：多元社會的反擊

面對極右翼的大規模動員，支持移民和多元文化的團體也迅速組織了反制活動。約5,000人參與了名為「挺身對抗種族主義」（Stand Up to Racism）的反制集會，他們高舉「難民歡迎」、「多元化讓我們更強大」、「反對種族主義」等標語。

Facing large-scale far-right mobilization, groups supporting immigrants and multiculturalism quickly organized counter-activities. About 5,000 people participated in a counter-rally called "Stand Up to Racism," holding signs saying "Refugees Welcome," "Diversity Makes Us Stronger," and "Against Racism."

工黨資深議員黛安·阿博特在反制集會上發表激情演講，她譴責羅賓遜及其盟友「散布謊言和仇恨」，呼籲英國人民「團結起來反對分裂和歧視」。她強調：「英國的偉大不在於排斥他人，而在於包容和多元。」

Senior Labour MP Diane Abbott gave a passionate speech at the counter-rally, condemning Robinson and his allies for "spreading lies and hatred" and calling on British people to "unite against division and discrimination." She emphasized: "Britain's greatness lies not in excluding others, but in inclusion and diversity."

警方小心地將兩個對立的集會分隔開來，避免直接衝突，但整個倫敦市中心的緊張氣氛依然濃厚。

Police carefully separated the two opposing rallies to avoid direct conflicts, but the tense atmosphere throughout central London remained heavy.

政府對反移民集會的分裂反應

面對如此大規模的極右翼示威，英國政府的反應顯得相當謹慎和分裂。首相基爾·斯塔默在事後發表聲明，他一方面譴責了針對警察的襲擊行為和種族主義騷擾，但同時也表示：「人們有權進行和平抗議，這是我們國家價值觀的核心。」

Facing such a large-scale far-right demonstration, the British government's response seemed quite cautious and divided. Prime Minister Keir Starmer issued a statement afterward, condemning attacks on police and racist harassment while also stating: "People have the right to peaceful protest. This is at the core of our national values."

商務大臣彼得·凱爾的表態更加微妙，他認為遊行者展示了「結社自由和言論自由」，但同時呼籲人們警惕被像湯米·羅賓遜這樣的人「利用不安情緒」。

Business Secretary Peter Kyle's position was more subtle. He believed the marchers demonstrated "freedom of association and speech" while calling on people to be wary of being "exploited by people like Tommy Robinson who use anxious emotions."

對於馬斯克的煽動性言論，首相發言人明確批評其「危險和具有煽動性」，但拒絕了自由民主黨黨魁埃德·戴維提出的制裁馬斯克的建議，理由是「言論自由必須受到保護」。

Regarding Musk's inflammatory comments, the Prime Minister's spokesperson clearly criticized them as "dangerous and inflammatory" but rejected Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey's proposal to sanction Musk, reasoning that "freedom of speech must be protected."

民意對於移民議題的深層分裂

各種民調數據揭示了英國社會在移民問題上的深層分裂。調查機構Ipsos的報告顯示，移民問題已經成為英國人最關心的政治問題，超過經濟和醫療。超過31%的受訪者認為，其所在地區收容的尋求庇護者數量「遠超過應有份額」。

Various polling data revealed deep divisions in British society over immigration issues. Research firm Ipsos reports show that immigration has become the most important political issue for British people, surpassing economy and healthcare. More than 31% of respondents believe their area is hosting "far more than its fair share" of asylum seekers.

更令人擔憂的是，YouGov的民意調查顯示，超過七成的受訪者對工黨處理移民問題的策略表示不滿，認為政府「太軟弱」、「缺乏決心」。甚至有40%的受訪者表示「理解」反移民示威者的憤怒，雖然不支持暴力行為。

More worryingly, YouGov polls show that more than 70% of respondents are dissatisfied with Labour's strategy for handling immigration issues, believing the government is "too weak" and "lacks determination." Even 40% of respondents said they "understand" the anger of anti-immigration demonstrators, although they don't support violent behavior.

反移民行動帶來的影響：政治版圖的右傾趨勢

（資料來源：Getty Images）

面對極右翼支持率的持續飆升，英國主流政黨都感受到了巨大壓力，紛紛調整自己的立場以迎合民意。

Facing the continued rise in far-right support, mainstream British political parties all felt enormous pressure and began adjusting their positions to cater to public opinion.

改革英國黨黨魁奈傑爾·法拉奇於8月23日提出了一項極為激進的改革計劃。他承諾，如果贏得下屆大選，將對乘小船來的非法移民進行「大規模驅逐行動」，並讓英國完全退出《歐洲人權公約》。法拉奇還提議與阿富汗、厄立特里亞等國簽署協議，強制遣返所有非法移民，「無論他們的個人情況如何」。

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage proposed an extremely radical reform plan on August 23. He promised that if he won the next general election, he would conduct "mass deportation operations" of illegal immigrants arriving by small boats and completely withdraw Britain from the European Convention on Human Rights. Farage also proposed signing agreements with Afghanistan, Eritrea, and other countries to forcibly return all illegal immigrants, "regardless of their personal circumstances."

保守黨的反應同樣激進。黨魁凱米·巴德諾赫早在6月就啟動了一個專門委員會，審查英國是否應該退出《歐洲人權公約》。保守黨內部有聲音認為，該公約已經成為「有效控制移民的最大障礙」。

The Conservative Party's reaction was equally radical. Party leader Kemi Badenoch started a special committee in June to review whether Britain should withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights. Voices within the Conservative Party believe the convention has become "the biggest obstacle to effective immigration control."

就連執政的工黨也開始向右轉。3月份，工黨政府就開始尋求對《歐洲人權公約》的變革。內政大臣伊薇特·庫珀向BBC證實，政府將對公約第八條進行審查，該條款保護「個人享有私人和家庭生活的權利」，常被移民用來申請家庭團聚或抵抗遣返。

Even the ruling Labour Party began moving rightward. In March, the Labour government began seeking changes to the European Convention on Human Rights. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper confirmed to the BBC that the government would review Article 8 of the convention, which protects "the right to respect for private and family life" and is often used by immigrants to apply for family reunification or resist deportation.

政府對移民政策的調整與回應

面對巨大的政治壓力，英國政府被迫採取一系列強硬措施來回應民意。9月1日，內政大臣伊薇特·庫珀宣布，英國將暫停接收新的難民家庭團聚申請，新規則將於明年春季正式實施。

Facing enormous political pressure, the British government was forced to adopt a series of tough measures to respond to public opinion. On September 1, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced that Britain would suspend accepting new refugee family reunification applications, with new rules to be formally implemented next spring.

為了進一步打擊非法移民，政府還提出了備受爭議的數字身份證計劃。根據該計劃，每個求職者都必須提供數字身份證明，證明其擁有合法居留權才可獲得工作機會。批評者認為這將侵犯隱私權和公民自由。

To further combat illegal immigration, the government also proposed a controversial digital ID plan. Under this plan, every job seeker must provide digital identity proof showing they have legal residence status before they can get job opportunities. Critics believe this will violate privacy rights and civil liberties.

英國政府還承諾將在2029年停止使用酒店接收政治庇護者，並於7月與法國簽訂「一進一出」移民協議。根據該協議，每當一名非法乘船抵達英國的移民被送回法國，法國就會允許一名在法國合法申請庇護者入境英國，以此減少使用小船橫渡英吉利海峽的非法移民數量。

The British government also promised to stop using hotels to house political asylum seekers by 2029 and signed a "one-in, one-out" immigration agreement with France in July. Under this agreement, for every illegal immigrant arriving in Britain by boat who is sent back to France, France will allow one person legally applying for asylum in France to enter Britain, thus reducing the number of illegal immigrants crossing the English Channel by small boats.

此外，政府還計劃改革庇護上訴程序，建立一個獨立的裁決機構來處理庇護上訴，以加快政治庇護案件的審理速度，減少積壓案件。

Additionally, the government plans to reform the asylum appeals process, establishing an independent adjudication body to handle asylum appeals to speed up the processing of political asylum cases and reduce backlogged cases.

法律反轉與反移民抗議的持續

然而，政府的努力並未能平息民怨。8月29日，上訴法院做出了一個意外的判決，推翻了對貝爾酒店的臨時禁令，允許尋求庇護者繼續在該酒店居住。法官在判決書中表示，如果允許抗議活動被用來獲取法律禁令，有可能會「激勵他人效仿，從而造成進一步鼓勵無視法律的風險」。

However, the government's efforts failed to calm public anger. On August 29, the Court of Appeal made an unexpected ruling, overturning the temporary injunction against the Bell Hotel and allowing asylum seekers to continue living there. The judge stated in the ruling that if protest activities were allowed to be used to obtain legal injunctions, it could "encourage others to follow suit, creating further risk of encouraging disregard for the law."

這個判決再次激怒了反移民活動分子，他們認為司法系統也被「左翼思想」滲透。抗議活動不僅沒有停止，反而進一步擴散到更多城市和地區。

This ruling once again angered anti-immigration activists, who believed the judicial system had also been "infiltrated by left-wing ideology." Protest activities not only did not stop but further spread to more cities and regions.

反移民行動的擴散

不只英國，荷蘭也爆發反移民示威

（資料來源：美聯社）

荷蘭海牙（The Hague）當地時間20日爆發大規模反移民示威。有示威者封鎖高速公路，與警方發生激烈衝突。期間有抗議民眾投擲石塊和瓶子，警方以水砲及催淚瓦斯驅散。更有一輛警車被燒毀，30人遭逮捕，2名警察受傷。

A large-scale anti-immigration demonstration broke out in The Hague, Netherlands on the 20th local time. Protesters blocked highways and had violent conflicts with police. During the event, protesters threw stones and bottles, and police used water cannons and tear gas to disperse them. A police car was also burned, 30 people were arrested, and 2 police officers were injured. 

《BBC》報導，《荷蘭通訊社》（ANP）引述警方消息指出，約1500人封鎖了一條穿越城市的高速公路。示威活動由一名右翼活動人士發起，訴求包括實施更嚴格的移民政策，並加強打擊尋求庇護者。大批示威者揮舞荷蘭國旗及極右翼團體相關旗幟，與安全部隊對峙。

BBC reported that the Dutch News Agency (ANP) quoted police sources saying that about 1,500 people blocked a highway that crosses the city. The demonstration was organized by a right-wing activist. Their demands included implementing stricter immigration policies and strengthening actions against asylum seekers. Large numbers of protesters waved Dutch flags and flags related to far-right groups, confronting security forces.

（資料來源：美聯社）

示威者砸毀了中左翼政黨民主66（D66）總部的窗戶。該黨黨魁耶滕（Rob Jetten）表示，黨部損壞嚴重，並警告示威者「遠離政黨」。據報導，事發時D66辦公室內沒有人在場。  

Protesters smashed the windows of the center-left party Democratic 66 (D66) headquarters. Party leader Rob Jetten said the party office was seriously damaged and warned protesters to "stay away from political parties." According to reports, no one was in the D66 office when the incident happened.  

荷蘭首相舒夫（Dick Schoof）譴責這起事件是「令人震驚和匪夷所思的無恥暴力」，並強調這是「完全不可接受的」。 

Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof condemned the incident as "shocking and unthinkable shameless violence" and emphasized that it was "completely unacceptable."  

在10月29日投票前的民調中保持領先的右翼領袖、被稱為「荷蘭版川普」的威爾德斯（Geert Wilders）雖被邀請在示威中發言，但沒有出席。他也譴責針對警察的暴力行為「完全不可接受」，並指這是「白痴」所為。

Right-wing leader Geert Wilders, who leads in polls before the October 29 vote and is called the "Dutch Trump," was invited to speak at the demonstration but did not attend. He also condemned the violence against police as "completely unacceptable" and said it was done by "idiots."

反移民國際串聯：極右翼言論的國際擴散

政治極端主義研究員卡勒姆·瓊斯在接受SBS採訪時指出，英國此次的反移民遊行與澳洲、德國等國的類似活動高度相似。極右翼團體越來越善於利用住房困境、生活成本上升等普遍性社會問題進行政治動員。他們巧妙地將這些問題歸咎於移民，宣稱「移民奪走了本土居民原本可獲取的資源與特權」。

Political extremism researcher Callum Jones, in an interview with SBS, pointed out that Britain's anti-immigration marches were highly similar to similar activities in Australia, Germany, and other countries. Far-right groups are becoming increasingly skilled at using universal social problems like housing difficulties and rising living costs for political mobilization. They cleverly blame these problems on immigrants, claiming that "immigrants have taken away resources and privileges that local residents could have obtained."

社交媒體在傳播極右翼理念和打破地理障礙方面發揮了關鍵作用。瓊斯解釋說，「像移民這樣的概念非常寬泛，因此很容易被轉換到任何一個國家的語境中」。透過Facebook、Twitter、Telegram等平台，英國的極右翼活動分子與美國的MAGA運動、德國的選擇黨、法國的國民聯盟等建立了密切聯繫。

Social media has played a key role in spreading far-right ideas and breaking down geographical barriers. Jones explained that "concepts like immigration are very broad, so they can easily be transferred to any country's context." Through platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Telegram, British far-right activists have established close connections with America's MAGA movement, Germany's Alternative for Germany party, and France's National Rally.

反移民相關詞彙普及化：媒體與政治語言的影響

「未來英國」智庫主任卡特瓦拉指出，政府與媒體經常直接引用極右翼的反移民詞彙，導致民眾逐漸習慣這些言論，客觀上助長了極右勢力。例如，將難民和尋求庇護者稱為「船民」（Boat People）、妖魔化國際學生、支持海外拘留等政治語言，都對極右運動起到了推波助瀾的作用。

"Future Britain" think tank director Katwala pointed out that government and media often directly quote far-right anti-immigration vocabulary, causing the public to gradually become accustomed to these statements, objectively encouraging far-right forces. For example, referring to refugees and asylum seekers as "boat people," demonizing international students, and supporting offshore detention are all political language that has helped fuel far-right movements.

研究極右派政治暴力的學者吉勒斯皮進一步指出，當主流政治人物開始使用極右翼的語言框架時，實際上是在為極端思想的正常化鋪路。這種語言的滲透比直接的政治宣傳更加危險，因為它潛移默化地改變了公眾對問題的認知框架。

Scholar Gillespie, who studies far-right political violence, further pointed out that when mainstream politicians begin using far-right language frameworks, they are actually paving the way for the normalization of extreme ideas. This linguistic infiltration is more dangerous than direct political propaganda because it subtly changes the public's cognitive framework for understanding problems.

未來展望：反移民議題、政治風暴遠未結束

9月13日的大規模示威只是英國反移民浪潮的一個高潮，而非結束。各種跡象表明，這場政治風暴將持續影響英國的政治版圖。

The large-scale demonstration on September 13 was just one climax of Britain's anti-immigration wave, not the end. Various signs indicate that this political storm will continue to affect Britain's political landscape.

極右翼團體已經宣布將繼續組織類似活動，湯米·羅賓遜在社交媒體上表示，「這只是開始，真正的變革才剛剛開始」。改革英國黨的支持率持續上升，已經對保守黨和工黨構成實質威脅。

Far-right groups have announced they will continue organizing similar activities. Tommy Robinson stated on social media that "this is just the beginning, real change is just starting." Reform UK's approval ratings continue to rise, already posing a substantial threat to both the Conservative and Labour parties.

與此同時，支持移民和多元文化的團體也在加強組織，準備進行長期的政治抗爭。英國社會的分裂正在加深，而政治菁英們則在民粹主義的壓力下不斷調整立場，整個國家的政治走向充滿不確定性。

At the same time, groups supporting immigrants and multiculturalism are also strengthening their organization, preparing for long-term political struggle. British society's divisions are deepening, while political elites constantly adjust their positions under populist pressure, making the country's political direction full of uncertainty.

這場始於埃平地區一個庇護酒店的抗議活動，最終演變成影響全國政治格局的重大事件，揭示了當代西方民主社會在面對移民、多元文化和全球化挑戰時的深層困境。英國的經驗也為其他面臨類似問題的國家提供了重要的觀察樣本。

This protest that began at an asylum hotel in the Epping area eventually evolved into a major event affecting the national political landscape, revealing the deep difficulties contemporary Western democratic societies face when confronting challenges of immigration, multiculturalism, and globalization. Britain's experience also provides an important observation sample for other countries facing similar problems.