台北車站 M7 出口、中山站百貨商圈——這些台北人每天經過的地方，差點在這幾天淪為火海煉獄。隨著警方解密嫌犯雲端硬碟裡的計畫書，外界才驚覺 57 歲的余家昶先生當下捨命阻擋的，究竟是什麼樣的恐怖深淵。這不是臨時起意的犯案，而是一場籌備了半年的毀滅行動。
The M7 exit of Taipei Main Station, the shopping district near Zhongshan MRT Station—these are places that Taipei residents pass through every single day. Yet these familiar locations nearly became scenes of fiery devastation. As police decrypted the planning documents stored in the suspect's cloud drive, the public finally understood what kind of terrifying catastrophe 57-year-old Mr. Yu Jia-chang had sacrificed his life to prevent. This was not a crime of impulse; it was a destructive operation that had been in preparation for six months.
「真的不敢想像，如果那 25 顆汽油彈真的被引爆，後果會有多嚴重⋯⋯。」
"It is truly unimaginable how catastrophic the consequences would have been if those 25 Molotov cocktails had actually been detonated."
根據警方調查與媒體報導，27 歲的嫌犯張文可說是武裝到了牙齒。他不只穿著戰術背心、攜帶長短刀，行李箱裡更裝了整整一箱、至少 25 顆汽油彈。在他的「雲端犯罪計畫書」中，這場殺戮有著令人毛骨悚然的標準作業程序：
According to police investigations and media reports, 27-year-old suspect Zhang Wen was armed to the teeth. He was not only wearing a tactical vest and carrying both long and short knives, but his suitcase also contained at least 25 Molotov cocktails. In his "cloud-based crime plan," the massacre had a chilling standard operating procedure.
首先，在台北車站 M7 出口丟擲汽油彈與煙幕彈，製造恐慌與火災；接著，趁現場混亂之際，持刀隨機攻擊逃竄的路人。
First, he would throw Molotov cocktails and smoke grenades at Taipei Main Station's M7 exit to create panic and start fires. Then, taking advantage of the chaos, he would randomly attack fleeing pedestrians with his knives.
最可怕的是，這還只是第一站——他計畫隨後轉往南京西路、捷運中山站一帶的百貨商圈，把同樣的恐怖攻擊模式再走一遍。
Most terrifyingly, this was only the first stop—he planned to proceed to Nanjing West Road and the shopping district around Zhongshan MRT Station to carry out the same pattern of terrorist attacks all over again.
這場惡夢之所以沒有完全成真，全是因為 57 歲的余家昶先生。
The reason this nightmare did not fully materialize was entirely due to 57-year-old Mr. Yu Jia-chang.
（資料來源：Youtube - CNN-News18）
北捷殺人事件案發現場
事件發生於週五下班尖峰時段，當地時間下午 5 點 20 分（格林威治標準時間上午 9 點 20 分）。兇嫌在台北車站 M7 出口地下一樓通道丟擲煙霧彈，現場一度濃煙密布，造成民眾恐慌。
The incident occurred during the Friday evening rush hour at 5:20 PM local time (9:20 AM Greenwich Mean Time). The assailant threw smoke grenades in the underground passage on basement level one at Taipei Main Station's M7 exit, filling the area with thick smoke and causing widespread panic among commuters.
兇嫌隨後經由地下街逃逸至附近的中山站，先跑回投宿的旅館取出凶器，再返回中山站外的馬路上。他沿途不斷丟擲煙霧彈，並持刀無差別攻擊路人，隨後闖入鄰近的百貨公司「誠品南西店」內藏匿。遭警方包圍後，兇嫌墜樓，當場失去生命跡象，送醫搶救後仍宣告不治。
The assailant subsequently fled through the underground shopping street to nearby Zhongshan Station. He first ran back to the hotel where he was staying to retrieve his weapons, then returned to the street outside Zhongshan Station. Along the way, he continuously threw smoke grenades and indiscriminately attacked pedestrians with a knife. He then broke into the nearby department store "Eslite Nanxi" to hide. After being surrounded by police, the assailant fell from the building and showed no signs of life at the scene. He was pronounced dead after being rushed to the hospital for emergency treatment.
台灣警政署署長張榮興於 20 日上午表示，這起事件共造成 4 人死亡、11 人受傷。台北市災害防救辦公室稍早指出，部分傷者係自行前往醫院就醫。
Chang Rong-hsing, Director-General of Taiwan's National Police Agency, stated on the morning of the 20th that the incident resulted in 4 deaths and 11 injuries. The Taipei City Disaster Prevention and Response Office had earlier indicated that some of the injured had gone to hospitals to seek medical treatment on their own.
根據台灣 TVBS 報導，死者包括一名 57 歲余姓男子、一名 37 歲蕭姓男子，以及一名 37 歲王姓男子。其餘傷者的傷勢則包括初期滅火時的嗆傷、胸部穿刺傷、肩部割傷、下巴撕裂傷等。
According to Taiwan's TVBS report, the deceased included a 57-year-old man surnamed Yu, a 37-year-old man surnamed Hsiao, and a 37-year-old man surnamed Wang. The injuries sustained by the other victims included smoke inhalation during initial firefighting efforts, chest puncture wounds, shoulder lacerations, and chin lacerations.
（資料來源：news.pts.org.tw）
北捷殺人事件兇嫌資料
根據官方公布資料，兇嫌為台灣籍、27 歲男子張文，本籍為桃園楊梅。
According to official information, the assailant was a 27-year-old Taiwanese man named Zhang Wen, originally from Yangmei District in Taoyuan City.
綜合中央社、ETtoday、《自由時報》等當地媒體報導，張文因「妨害兵役」案件遭桃園地檢署通緝。他於今年 1 月搬遷至台北市中正區公園路的一間套房居住，但在犯案前兩天、也就是 12 月 17 日，又另外在台北市大同區南京西路的一家旅館租房。
Based on comprehensive reports from local media outlets including the Central News Agency, ETtoday, and the Liberty Times, Zhang Wen had been wanted by the Taoyuan District Prosecutors Office for "obstruction of military service." He moved into a studio apartment on Gongyuan Road in Zhongzheng District, Taipei City in January of this year. However, just two days before committing the crime—on December 17th—he rented another room at a hotel on Nanjing West Road in Datong District, Taipei City.
在隨機傷人案發生之前，張嫌於同日下午曾先後在中山區三處縱火，造成多輛汽車與機車毀損。警方表示，張嫌疑似因連續縱火卻未獲得警方及社會重視，遂前往台北車站投擲煙霧彈；隨後返回南京西路的旅館，再攜帶刀械與煙霧彈至南京西路的誠品百貨作案。
Before the random stabbing incident occurred, the suspect had set fires at three different locations in Zhongshan District on the same afternoon, causing damage to multiple cars and motorcycles. Police stated that Zhang allegedly proceeded to Taipei Main Station to throw smoke grenades because his serial arson had failed to attract attention from either the police or the public. He then returned to the hotel on Nanjing West Road before taking knives and smoke grenades to the Eslite department store on Nanjing West Road to commit the attack.
旅館搜出大量證物警方事後前往張文投宿的旅館進行搜索，搜出刀子一把、約 25 瓶汽油彈、雨衣、黑色帽子，以及兩台平板電腦，將進一步調查其犯案動機。
Police subsequently searched the hotel where Zhang had been staying and discovered one knife, approximately 25 Molotov cocktails, a raincoat, a black hat, and two tablet computers. They will conduct further investigation into his motive for the crime.
警方另表示，根據張嫌的作案模式及預先設置多處藏匿地點來研判，認為他原本並無輕生意圖，疑似是在遭警方追捕時才意外墜樓。
Police also stated that based on Zhang's modus operandi and the multiple hiding spots he had prepared in advance, they believe he originally had no intention of taking his own life. It is suspected that he accidentally fell from the building while being pursued by police.
台北市刑事警察大隊已成立反恐應變中心，將釐清犯嫌的作案動機，並調查是否有共犯。
The Taipei City Criminal Investigation Division has established a counter-terrorism response center to clarify the suspect's motive and investigate whether there were any accomplices.
根據《鏡週刊》報導，張文墜樓身亡後，其父母在醫院表示，兩年多未與兒子聯絡，也不清楚他近況；住在高雄的哥哥同樣表示對弟弟近期狀況毫不知情。家屬對事件感到震驚與無奈。
According to Mirror Media, after Zhang fell to his death, his parents stated at the hospital that they had not been in contact with their son for more than two years and were unaware of his recent situation. His older brother, who lives in Kaohsiung, also said he knew nothing about his younger brother's recent circumstances. The family expressed shock and helplessness over the incident.
（資料來源：mirrormedia.mg）
捨身阻止殺人兇嫌的英雄：余家昶先生
當時張文已經丟出了煙幕彈，正準備打開那個裝滿汽油彈的行李箱開始縱火。就在這千鈞一髮的時刻，余先生沒有選擇逃跑，而是衝上前阻止。儘管這導致他被張文猛刺多刀、最終傷重不治，但正是因為他的拼死一搏，硬生生打斷了嫌犯「丟汽油彈、隨機攻擊」的連續技，迫使張文只能倉皇逃走。嫌犯最終在隨機殺害更多民眾後身亡。
At that critical moment, Zhang had already thrown a smoke grenade and was preparing to open the suitcase full of Molotov cocktails to start his arson attack. In that split second, Mr. Yu did not choose to flee. Instead, he rushed forward to stop the attacker. Although this resulted in Mr. Yu being stabbed multiple times by Zhang and ultimately losing his life due to his severe injuries, it was precisely because of his desperate intervention that the suspect's planned sequence of "throwing Molotov cocktails followed by random attacks" was forcibly interrupted. Zhang was compelled to flee in a panic. The suspect eventually died after randomly killing more civilians.
這起事件共造成 15 人送醫、2 人命危，以及包含嫌犯在內的 4 人死亡。儘管傷亡慘重，但若沒有余先生在第一時間以肉身擋住那只行李箱，讓幾十顆汽油彈在密閉的地下街引爆，再加上中山站的後續攻擊計畫⋯⋯死傷人數恐怕會是現在的數十倍。
This incident resulted in 15 people being sent to hospitals, 2 in critical condition, and 4 deaths including the suspect. Despite the heavy casualties, if Mr. Yu had not physically blocked that suitcase at the very first moment—if those dozens of Molotov cocktails had detonated in the enclosed underground passage, combined with the subsequent planned attacks at Zhongshan Station—the death toll would likely have been dozens of times higher than the current figure.
目前中山站商圈已有民眾自發獻花致哀，也有學生寫信感念這位擋刀英雄。法醫高大成分析指出，嫌犯「手法專業且有意逃脫」，顯示這絕非衝動犯案。
Currently, members of the public have spontaneously placed flowers in the Zhongshan Station shopping district to pay their respects, and students have written letters honoring this hero who blocked the knife. Forensic expert Dr. Gao Da-cheng analyzed that the suspect's "methods were professional and he intended to escape," indicating that this was absolutely not an impulsive crime.
（資料來源：knews.com.tw）
北捷殺人事件案外插曲
傷者有 HIV，其他受害者有感染風險？
隨機殺人事件餘波未平，今日又爆出一個敏感焦點——其中一名被砍傷的民眾是愛滋病毒感染者。不少人開始擔心：「後續也被同一把刀劃傷的人，是不是有可能一起被傳染？」
The random killing incident in Taipei has not yet subsided, and today another sensitive issue has emerged—one of the victims who was stabbed is a person living with HIV. Many people have begun to worry: "Could the other people who were subsequently cut by the same knife also have been infected?"
衛生福利部已證實，這位傷者確實是 HIV 感染者，但目前服藥穩定、體內病毒量極低。疾病管制署強調，即使現場有血液接觸，透過刀刃間接傳播的風險也極低，估計小於萬分之一。
The Ministry of Health and Welfare has confirmed that this victim is indeed an HIV-positive individual, but the person is currently on stable medication with a very low viral load. The Taiwan Centers for Disease Control emphasized that even if there was blood contact at the scene, the risk of indirect transmission through a knife blade is extremely low, estimated at less than one in ten thousand.
此外，只要在黃金 72 小時內接受預防性投藥，就能將感染機率降到幾乎為零。
Furthermore, as long as preventive medication is administered within the golden window of 72 hours, the probability of infection can be reduced to nearly zero.
官方已啟動暴露後諮詢與公費投藥專案，有需要的民眾都可以獲得協助，無須過度恐慌。
The authorities have already initiated a post-exposure consultation program along with publicly funded medication, and anyone in need can receive assistance. There is no need for excessive panic.
這次媒體直接公開「某傷者為愛滋感染者」的身分，在網路上引發熱議。有些人認為應該讓大眾知道真相，以便其他傷者評估自身風險；但也有人認為這樣做對當事人太過殘忍，容易造成二度傷害甚至引發歧視。
This time, the media directly disclosed that "a certain victim is an HIV-positive individual," which has sparked heated discussion online. Some people believe that the public should know the truth so that other victims can assess their own risk. However, others argue that doing so is too cruel to the person involved and could easily cause secondary harm or even trigger discrimination.
事實上，醫界早已說明清楚：HIV 主要透過高風險行為或直接血液進入體內才會傳染，一般生活接觸根本無須擔心。公開他人病史涉及隱私權，社會應該多一點同理心，不要任意肉搜、也不必貼上標籤。
In fact, the medical community has long made this clear: HIV is primarily transmitted through high-risk behaviors or when blood directly enters the body. There is absolutely no need to worry about transmission through ordinary daily contact. Disclosing someone's medical history involves privacy rights, and society should show more empathy rather than conducting witch hunts or attaching stigmatizing labels.
手搖飲料品牌悼念死者遭轟作秀
手搖飲料品牌「UG Tea 樂己」老闆親自攜帶飲料與花束至中山商圈的誠品南西店，原意是為悼念因張文攻擊而傷亡的無辜民眾，卻因為擺放了滿是明顯品牌標誌的飲料，遭質疑是在進行置入性行銷，引發網路社群一片撻伐。
UG Tea (Le Ji), a hand-shaken beverage brand, drew backlash after its owner personally brought drinks and a bouquet to Eslite Nanxi in Taipei’s Zhongshan shopping district. The original intention was to mourn the innocent victims who were injured or killed in an attack by Chang Wen. However, because the drinks displayed prominent brand logos, the gesture was questioned as product placement marketing, triggering widespread condemnation across online communities.
對此，UG 飲料老闆、聯發國際董事長鄭凱隆與總經理陳聖中，於今日（21 日）緊急召開媒體說明會，親上火線鞠躬道歉。
In response, UG’s owner—MediaTek International Chairman Cheng Kai-lung—along with General Manager Chen Sheng-chung, convened an emergency press briefing today (the 21st) and publicly bowed to apologize.
聯發國際董事長鄭凱隆表示：「此事件本身就十分悲痛，卻因為我的不當行為而模糊了真正該被關注的焦點，進一步引發不必要的輿論與誤解。我願意完全承擔責任，並向社會大眾致上最誠摯的歉意。」
Chairman Cheng Kai-lung said, “This incident is deeply tragic in itself, yet my inappropriate actions blurred the true focus that should have been paid attention to, further causing unnecessary public controversy and misunderstanding. I am willing to take full responsibility and offer my most sincere apologies to the public.”
鄭凱隆強調，今天這場說明會並非任何形式的藉口，所有媒體及社群的聲音他都聽到了，所有的批評與質疑都虛心接受，也再次向大家道歉。他承諾，未來在任何公共場合和社會事件中，將以更謹慎、尊重、成熟的態度面對社會的期待。
Cheng emphasized that today’s briefing was not an attempt to make excuses. He said he had heard all voices from the media and social platforms, humbly accepted all criticism and doubts, and once again apologized to everyone. He also pledged that in any future public setting or social incident, he will respond to society’s expectations with a more cautious, respectful, and mature attitude.
北捷殺人事件後續探討：為何隨機傷人事件頻傳？
（資料來源：trins.org）
全球隨機傷人事件頻傳，重症醫師黃軒在臉書專頁發文指出，從公共衛生角度來看，這類事件反覆出現本身就代表並非偶然，而是群體心理健康失衡的結果。
As random attack incidents continue to occur frequently around the world, critical care physician Dr. Huang Hsuan wrote on his Facebook page that from a public health perspective, the repeated occurrence of such incidents itself indicates that these are not coincidences but rather the result of collective mental health imbalance.
黃軒表示，當同類型的隨機暴力在不同國家、不同文化、不同行政體系中一再發生，就已不再是單純的刑事個案。他引用公共衛生定義強調：「會反覆發生、可被風險因子解釋、可被預防的，就不是意外。」
Dr. Huang stated that when the same type of random violence occurs repeatedly across different countries, different cultures, and different administrative systems, it is no longer simply a criminal case. Citing the definition used in public health, he emphasized: "If something occurs repeatedly, can be explained by risk factors, and can be prevented, then it is not an accident."
回溯多數案例，加害者事前常見的並非突然失控，而是長期累積的狀態：持續性心理壓力、社會孤立與邊緣化、強烈的失敗感與被剝奪感，以及想求助卻不知如何開口的困境。
Looking back at most cases, what is commonly seen in perpetrators beforehand is not a sudden loss of control, but rather a long-term accumulation of conditions: persistent psychological stress, social isolation and marginalization, intense feelings of failure and deprivation, and a state of wanting to seek help but not knowing how to ask.
高風險者往往不在醫療系統/High-Risk Individuals Are Often Not in the Healthcare System
黃軒指出，真正的高風險者往往不在醫療系統裡。這群人通常沒有精神疾病診斷、不符合任何補助或追蹤標準，表面上功能正常，私下卻一直在硬撐。他直言，現行制度只照顧已被診斷的人，卻忽略了快撐不住的人，這正是公共衛生最大的盲點。
Dr. Huang pointed out that truly high-risk individuals are often not within the healthcare system. These people typically have no psychiatric diagnosis, do not meet the criteria for any subsidies or follow-up programs, and appear to function normally on the surface while privately struggling to hold on. He stated bluntly that the current system only takes care of those who have already been diagnosed while ignoring those who are on the verge of breaking down. This is precisely the biggest blind spot in public health.
社會孤立：最被低估的危險因子/Social Isolation: The Most Underestimated Risk Factor
針對社會孤立問題，黃軒認為這是最核心卻最被低估的背景因子。他說明，當家庭支持、社區連結、工作安全感逐一瓦解，一個人可能還活著、還在上班、還在說話，但心理上早已沒有任何可承載情緒的地方。孤立不會立刻造成暴力，但會慢慢切斷所有回到理性的路。
Regarding the issue of social isolation, Dr. Huang believes this is the most central yet most underestimated background factor. He explained that when family support, community connections, and job security collapse one by one, a person may still be alive, still going to work, and still talking, but psychologically there is no longer any place capable of bearing their emotions. Isolation does not immediately cause violence, but it slowly severs all paths back to rationality.
黃軒分析，多數隨機傷人事件並非源自對特定對象的仇恨，而是一種對整個社會的失控反應。陌生人只是當下最容易接觸、也最不需要解釋的出口。
Dr. Huang analyzed that most random attack incidents do not stem from hatred toward a specific target, but rather represent an uncontrolled reaction against society as a whole. Strangers are simply the most accessible targets at that moment and the outlet that requires no explanation.
他同時提醒，研究一再顯示，過度細節化、英雄化、情緒渲染的報導會引發模仿效應。對心理脆弱族群而言，這不是資訊，而是一種危險的行為示範。
He also reminded the public that research has repeatedly shown that media coverage that is excessively detailed, heroizing, or emotionally sensationalized can trigger copycat effects. For psychologically vulnerable groups, this is not information—it is a dangerous behavioral demonstration.
真正有效的預防是事前介入/Truly Effective Prevention Means Early Intervention
黃軒強調，真正有效的預防策略從來不只是事後圍堵，而是事前介入，包括：心理健康去污名化、基層人員的早期辨識能力、社區支持與陪伴網絡，以及不需要診斷、不需要標籤的求助管道。他呼籲：「越早接住，代價越低，悲劇也越少。」
Dr. Huang emphasized that truly effective prevention strategies have never been solely about containment after the fact, but rather about early intervention. This includes destigmatizing mental health, enhancing the early identification capabilities of frontline personnel, establishing community support and companionship networks, and creating help-seeking channels that do not require a diagnosis or a label. He appealed: "The earlier we catch someone, the lower the cost, and the fewer the tragedies."
結論：悲劇早在集體忽略中醞釀/Conclusion: Tragedies Have Long Been Brewing in Collective Neglect
黃軒在文末總結，每一次隨機傷人事件都在提醒社會：如果只處理結果，卻不處理人是怎麼被逼到那一步的，悲劇只會換一個人、換一個地點再來一次。他再次強調，隨機傷人事件表面看是治安問題，本質卻是公共心理健康系統的失敗。所有看起來突然的悲劇，其實早就在集體忽略的地方慢慢醞釀。
Dr. Huang concluded at the end of his post that every random attack incident serves as a reminder to society: if we only address the outcome without addressing how a person was pushed to that point, the tragedy will simply happen again with a different person in a different place. He reiterated that random attack incidents may appear on the surface to be public safety issues, but in essence they represent a failure of the public mental health system. All tragedies that seem sudden have actually been slowly brewing in places where they were collectively ignored.
